On namelessness

All movements with a name are not enough for me.

If a movement has a name, it’s forced to be localized, in the most basic case simply because of the script (e.g. Latin letters) the name is written in.

Consequently, we face a conundrum: Any movement that aims to make the world a better place must not have a name to be effective, yet it can only be effective if it has a name, because otherwise it cannot make itself known.

Places get generally accepted names once they become associated with a post office, but even that can go wrong.

---

The world is a theatre play. Some are guided by money, some are guided by love, some are guided by the divine, some are guided by a certain scripture, some are guided by themselves, some are not guided at all.

How can we give each other guidance and create interdependency instead of co-dependency?